Phaser vs PixiJS
Sources verified · Sources (2)
Both draw 2D graphics in the browser with WebGL. Phaser is a complete game framework; PixiJS is a fast renderer that leaves game structure to you.
Verdict
Making a game? Start with Phaser. Need a fast 2D canvas inside something else? PixiJS.
Pick Phaser when
- You're building a game and want the standard pieces ready
- Game jams and fast prototypes
Pick PixiJS when
- You want full control of game structure, or you're not building a game
- Interactive sites, data visualizations, and animated UI
Related playbooks
What actually differs
PhaserPixiJS
ScopePhaser: Full framework: scenes, physics, input, audio, tilemaps, camerasPixiJS: Rendering engine: sprites, text, graphics, filters
PhysicsPhaser: Built in (Arcade, Matter.js)PixiJS: None — bring your own
Best atPhaser: Getting a playable game quicklyPixiJS: Custom architecture and interactive graphics